#The presentify discount code full#
The speaker is proposing that the object towards which participants are co-orienting (here the Acts of Accession) will only attain its full meaning when interpreted dynamically by an audience (here comprising political leaders of member states).
‘Their accomplishment is transferred to the responsibility of the audience’ (Törrönen 2000: 83). Malfatti leaves the ‘implications’ of the ‘political process’ pending. This speech, typical of what institutional spokespeople say when organizational treaties, agreements or strategies are officially adopted, employs a semiotic macrostructure which can be termed a pending account. a political process pregnant with extraordinary and positive implications. The signatures placed today under the Acts of Accession are the culmination of a political process īut this process was not, in fact, finished, for it was: The reason dignitaries from ten European states had gathered in Brussels was that something was culminating: It is now for the Community of Ten to transform it into the great flame of united Europe. We representatives of the Community of Six are proud to have made today’s historic meeting possible, having fanned the spark into a flame.
In his celebratory address, Franco Maria Malfatti, Commission President, figuratively passed the baton from what he called ‘the Six’ to ‘the Ten’: Introduction: the basic structure of the pending accountĪt a ceremony in Brussels on 22 January 1972, Britain, Ireland, Denmark and Norway signed the Acts of Accession to the European Economic Community. GREIMAS, Eric LANDOWSKI, Charles Sanders PEIRCE, Anssi Peräkylä, Melissa Stevanovic, Jukka Törrönenġ. Mots-clés : autorité, compte en attente, émotion, hypothèse, interprétant, métaconversation, métatexte, passion, présentification, sentimentĪuteurs cités : Jacques FONTANILLE, Algirdas J. Keywords : authority, emotion, feeling, hypothesis, interpretant, metaconversation, metatext, passion, pending account, presentification L’article montre comment les deux sémiotiques peuvent être combinées afin d’expliquer l’usage de l’émotion dans l’articulation et l’autorisation des comptes d’attente sur la base d’une analyse indicative de quatre interprétations de l’accord de retrait entre l’Union européenne et le Royaume-Uni en 2020.Īrticles du même auteur parus dans les Actes Sémiotiques Si Peirce nous apprend comment les sentiments déclenchent une enquête volontaire orientée vers la fixation de la croyance, Greimas explique comment les passions (mais aussi les scripts) jouent un rôle important dans la sanction et, par extension, la (dé)commande des actions. Les sémiotiques de Peirce et de Greimas suggèrent deux manières distinctes d’associer l’émotion aux autres registres de sensemaking pour mettre en place ces incitations. Le compte en attente appartient aux genres discursifs qui nous orientent vers l’action. Les métatextes interprétatifs nous disent ce qu’un autre texte veut dire s’ils ont recours à un compte d’attente pour faire cela, ils nous disent ce que ce texte veut dire en nous disant que faire et ils disent que faire en nous disant quelque chose sur nos inclinations à agir d’une certaine façon, soit en verbalisant des habitudes, soit en convoquant des scripts ou des passions. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement.Ĭet article examine l’usage d’une macrostructure sémiotique, que j’appelle le « compte d’attente », comme métatexte interprétatif pour configurer les « affordances » motivationnelles des textes stratégiques et conférer une autorité aux revendications déontiques. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims.
0 kommentar(er)
